Three Crucial Scientific Observations from Mistaken Hypotheses
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1949 John Cade, a senior medical officer of the Victorian Department of Mental Hygiene, Australia, investigated the effects of lithium carbonate and lithium citrate on the mental state of patients suffering from mania or manic depression (1). This illness is sometimes known as bipolar disorder. Lithium was regarded as a controversial medication, which had resulted in the deaths of some patients and could sometimes cause unpleasant side effects. In the 19th century it was used for the treatment of gout and other ailments following the discovery by Garrod that lithium urate, a salt of uric acid, was the most soluble alkali metal urate. The presence of crystalline monosodium urate monohydrate (2) in the human body causes acute gouty arthritis, so the traditional use of lithium as a remedy for this has a theoretical basis. Pieces of cartilage with uric acid deposits were immersed in solutions of sodium, potassium, and lithium carbonate. Lithium carbonate was the fastest solution to dissolve the deposits. Enthusiasm for its use extended into other medications and also led to the widespread use of bottled curative waters, some of which are still marketed today, such as Perrier and Vichy, promoted at one time for their lithium content. THREE CRUCIAL SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATIONS FROM MISTAKEN HYPOTHESES
منابع مشابه
On types of scientific inquiry: The role of qualitative reasoning
One type of scientific inquiry involves the analysis of large data sets, often using statistical models and formal tests of hypotheses. A moment’s thought, however, shows that there must be other types of scientific inquiry. For instance, something has to be done to answer questions like the following. How should a study be designed? What sorts of data should be collected? What kind of a model ...
متن کاملRevisiting "Is the scientific paper a fraud?": The way textbooks and scientific research articles are being used to teach undergraduate students could convey a misleading image of scientific research.
I n 1963, Peter Medawar gave a talk, Is the scientific paper a fraud?, in which he argued that scientific journal articles give a false impression of the real process of scientific discovery [1]. In answering his question, he argued that, “The scientific paper in its orthodox form does embody a totally mistaken conception, even a travesty, of the nature of scientific thought.” His main concern ...
متن کاملSome historical crossroads between astronomy and visual neuroscience
The histories of astronomy and visual neuroscience share some important events. Observation of the sky provided early basic information about visual acuity and sensitivity to light and their variations at different retinal locations. Some of the early tests of visual functions were inspired by astronomical knowledge existing since antiquity and possibly since human prehistory. After science bec...
متن کاملThe scientific method: pillar and pitfall of cancer research
A major goal of cancer research is to acquire knowledge that enables us to understand cancer and help mankind. To reach this goal, we need to conduct cancer research according to the scientific method. The scientific method stipulates that we begin by making observations of cancer. Then, we formulate hypotheses to explain our observations and devise experiments to test our hypotheses. Important...
متن کاملUsing Computational Creativity to Guide Data-intensive Scientific Discovery
The generation of plausible hypotheses from observations is a creative process. Scientists looking to explain phenomena must invent hypothetical relationships between their dependent and independent variables and then design methods to verify or falsify them. Datadriven science is expanding both the role of artificial intelligence in this process and the scale of the observations from which hyp...
متن کامل